Proposal to move and input?
Apr. 8th, 2017 10:26 amHi, all.
As you probably know, the recent changes in the LJ user agreement have prompted many users and communities to look for other homes--especially users and communities with free speech concerns, with LGBTQ and other identities, and those producing and consuming (and reviewing!) works we love. There is always the possibility of a journal being deleted by LJ authorities, but the risk seems higher now.
I'm proposing backing up the contents of this community and moving it to Dreamwidth. On Dreamwidth, the community would retain all posts and comments and tags from the LJ comm up to point of the backup.
The LJ comm would be closed to comments and posts originating on LJ. It's possible that cross-posts from Dreamwidth would be posted here. Anyone would still be able to read posts, however, and we can resume posting links on Tumblr.
This community depends vitally on participation by its members. Although it is possible for active LJ users to comment on Dreamwidth using OpenID, it's best that our reccers have DW accounts and join the new comm there. You would also need a Dreamwidth account to subscribe and be notified of updates.
Currently we have about 950 members and are watched by about 1400. We have an active pool of a few dozen reccers. I'd like to hear from you, the members, the readers, the reccers, about this proposal to move. Having reliable reccers on DW would greatly improve our success in a new home.
Thanks to you all --
Unovis
As you probably know, the recent changes in the LJ user agreement have prompted many users and communities to look for other homes--especially users and communities with free speech concerns, with LGBTQ and other identities, and those producing and consuming (and reviewing!) works we love. There is always the possibility of a journal being deleted by LJ authorities, but the risk seems higher now.
I'm proposing backing up the contents of this community and moving it to Dreamwidth. On Dreamwidth, the community would retain all posts and comments and tags from the LJ comm up to point of the backup.
The LJ comm would be closed to comments and posts originating on LJ. It's possible that cross-posts from Dreamwidth would be posted here. Anyone would still be able to read posts, however, and we can resume posting links on Tumblr.
This community depends vitally on participation by its members. Although it is possible for active LJ users to comment on Dreamwidth using OpenID, it's best that our reccers have DW accounts and join the new comm there. You would also need a Dreamwidth account to subscribe and be notified of updates.
Currently we have about 950 members and are watched by about 1400. We have an active pool of a few dozen reccers. I'd like to hear from you, the members, the readers, the reccers, about this proposal to move. Having reliable reccers on DW would greatly improve our success in a new home.
Thanks to you all --
Unovis
no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 04:34 pm (UTC)I already have a DW account under the same name.
Also: deleting the comm or posts here won't prevent "them" from accessing it. "They" already have your info. If you want make a statement about their policies by deleting your journal or comm, that's valid, but might as well leave it if access to your info is your concern.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 04:58 pm (UTC)Russian laws and policies are hostile toward free speech, political commentary, sexual preference and equality, and concepts of erotica. There is a heightened possibility of deletion and banning from publication on LJ under the new user agreement (English and Russian versions), though the danger is still theoretical. I would prefer to have the comm at DW right now.
ETA: there would of course be links to the new location. As I mentioned, there might be cross-posts to this comm from DW for as long as the comm exists here.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 05:52 pm (UTC)The rest of my reply was aimed at those who are deleting their journals here.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 05:32 pm (UTC)I'll definitely be following the comm on DW, though I won't be signing up to rec for a while. I have nothing in my rec queue and won't be doing much reading until late in the year as I'm focusing on writing until the autumn.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 07:04 pm (UTC)Though I'd prefer it if posts were mirrored on LJ.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 07:30 pm (UTC)I've been reading from DW all along
Date: 2017-04-08 08:09 pm (UTC)Dreamwidth lets you create a feed account, and then subscribe to it. You can't comment to that account, but you can click-through to comment on the original whence the feed.
So I've been happily following from
http://221b-recs-feed.dreamwidth.org/profile
The point being: DW helps you have LJ people & comms pop up in your friendlist
no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-08 11:51 pm (UTC)I'm a bit daunted by actually having to find all the fannish journals and communities I've gradually subscribed to over there, assuming they exist.
I'd be happy to follow and rec over there.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to find fannish comms on DW?
no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 12:05 am (UTC)Also, many LJ comms just use the same name in their mirror accounts on DW.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 01:49 am (UTC)As for the new user agreement, I must say, I did not understand it, or even the reason for it.
no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 07:44 pm (UTC)The new TOS seems to be more of the same: complying with requirements from the Russian government to permit easier monitoring of Russian users of the service. And since there are quite a few Russian political bloggers who use LiveJournal, and who chose it because it was hosted in the US and governed by US law...
However unpleasant that new TOS is for our purposes, it's a lot worse for people who have been blogging uncharitably about the Russian government. :-/
no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-04-09 11:56 pm (UTC)